翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. Dougherty
・ United States v. Drayton
・ United States v. Drescher
・ United States v. Drew
・ United States v. DuBay
・ United States v. Dunn
・ United States v. E. C. Knight Co.
・ United States v. Eichman
・ United States v. Elcom Ltd.
・ United States v. Emerson
・ United States v. Enmons
・ United States v. Extreme Associates, Inc.
・ United States v. Felix
・ United States v. Fenwick
・ United States v. Feola
United States v. Flores-Montano
・ United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
・ United States v. Fordice
・ United States v. Forty Barrels & Twenty Kegs of Coca-Cola
・ United States v. Franklin
・ United States v. Freed
・ United States v. Fricosu
・ United States v. Fuentes
・ United States v. Garcia
・ United States v. Gementera
・ United States v. General Dynamics Corp.
・ United States v. General Electric Co.
・ United States v. Georgia
・ United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.
・ United States v. Gilmore


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. Flores-Montano : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. Flores-Montano

''United States v. Flores-Montano'', , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that customs agents may remove the gas tank from a vehicle crossing the international border in an effort to look for contraband.
== Background ==
Flores-Montano ("Flores") was driving a 1987 Ford Taurus station wagon as he attempted to enter the United States through the port of entry at Otay Mesa, California. A customs inspector referred the vehicle to secondary inspection, where a second inspector tapped the gas tank and noticed it sounded solid. The second inspector summoned a mechanic who, less than half an hour later, arrived and removed the gas tank from the car. The mechanic then removed an access plate from the tank and found 37 kilograms of marijuana. The process of removing the gas tank took between 15 and 25 minutes.
Flores was indicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California for importing marijuana into the United States and for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute it. Relying on Ninth Circuit precedent in effect at the time requiring reasonable suspicion for removal of a gas tank, Flores filed a motion to suppress the marijuana found in his car. Although the Government urged the district court to ignore that precedent, the district court declined to do so and granted Flores's suppression motion. The Ninth Circuit summarily affirmed the granting of the suppression motion, and the Government asked the Supreme Court to review the case.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. Flores-Montano」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.